|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 11 post(s) |

Axis Raikkonen
EXPCS Corp SpaceMonkey's Alliance
52
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 15:12:00 -
[1] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote: So your suggesting that CCP should ban people in political parties guilty of starting wars of aggression?
Well I suppose that will annoy members of the US republican party, The Australian Liberal Party and UK labour party.
This just in, the war in Iraq is literally the Holocaust. |

Axis Raikkonen
EXPCS Corp SpaceMonkey's Alliance
52
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 15:20:00 -
[2] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:Either way around it is illegal to discriminate against someone for their political views. Either way around it is illegal to discriminate against someone for their skin color. Either way around it is illegal to discriminate against someone for their ethnicity. Either way around it is illegal to discriminate against someone for their nationality. Either way around it is illegal to discriminate against someone for their sexual orientation. Either way around it is illegal to discriminate against someone for their marital status. Either way around it is illegal to discriminate against someone for their religion.
Political views? Eh, sorry, no. Stupidity isn't a protected characteristic when it comes to discrimination.
|

Axis Raikkonen
EXPCS Corp SpaceMonkey's Alliance
53
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 15:44:00 -
[3] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote: Yes the lets call it old german party as it censors it, went out of their way to exterminate, Jews, Gays, Intellectuals, Communists, and the list goes on, using their military might.
The Na-Ązi movement went out of its way to forcibly silence its opponents and remove them from positions of power and influence. Under the leadership of Adolf Hi-Ątler, Germany rounded up millions of Jews, homosexuals, intellectuals, communists, gypsies, etc., painted them as scapegoats, and exterminated them under the banner of "purity", "social harmony", and "justice".
I can't imagine that someone who strongly associates themselves with said movement would fit the long-standing CSM requirement to "work well with others". |

Axis Raikkonen
EXPCS Corp SpaceMonkey's Alliance
53
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 16:47:00 -
[4] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:EvilweaselSA wrote:Frying Doom wrote: Go search Australian High court as so far you have managed to provide 0 other than badgering.
you are making the claim, you support it every time you give me something to actually work with (a mistake you've made twice) i've cited the specific provisions of actual law that knock it down and given everything you've said about law is incorrect we're obviously not going to take your word for it you clearly don't know what you're talking about at all and are just hoping i get distracted in a wild-goose chase for a link that doesn't exist Ok how about Directive 2006/54/EC that the countries laws come from? Directive 2006/54/EC concerns the matter of equal employment and wage opportunities on the basis of sex.
Last time I checked when I renewed my drivers license, the checkbox for sex didn't say
But that may have changed since then. |

Axis Raikkonen
EXPCS Corp SpaceMonkey's Alliance
53
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 16:50:00 -
[5] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:keep reading that is only the top I have read and studied the entire directive. It is all about sex. Sex, sex, sex, sex, sex.
Here, read for yourself, since it's clear you haven't yet: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2006:204:0023:0036:en:PDF |

Axis Raikkonen
EXPCS Corp SpaceMonkey's Alliance
53
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 17:41:00 -
[6] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote: It is my belief that human rights are worth fighting for, your opinion is that they are not.
Ask a Neo-Na-Ązi what they think about universal human rights.
Go on.
Ask. |

Axis Raikkonen
EXPCS Corp SpaceMonkey's Alliance
53
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 17:56:00 -
[7] - Quote
Womyn Power wrote:[ I consider myself a classical national socialist and I'm all for human rights as long as they don't trample upon my own.
Tell me, how do you reconcile "I'm all for human rights" with "get out of my country that I'm not originally from because WHITE POWER WHITE POWER WHITE POWER"? im totally legit interested, tia |

Axis Raikkonen
EXPCS Corp SpaceMonkey's Alliance
53
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 18:01:00 -
[8] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote: So because a Neo-Na-Ązi does not believe in anothers human rights they should not have any?
Actually, yeah.
Just like how freedom of speech and expression cannot be expressly used to suppress the freedom of expression of others (hate speech), I believe that abuse of your human rights to invalidate another's is grounds for invalidating your own. |

Axis Raikkonen
EXPCS Corp SpaceMonkey's Alliance
53
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 18:08:00 -
[9] - Quote
Roderick Grey wrote:Ivana Twinkle wrote:Varesk wrote:Eezee Gonozal wrote: I already reported your post :) Goonswarm 2013. Not sure what happened to GSF. You guys use to be the leaders in this kind of stuff. Look at your history with Ev0ke. I am sure you know all about this. Congrats on turning GSF into Bob. So objecting ageinst neo ***** and rasists makes us BoB? Do you feel hit by the arguments since you make that connection? someone's disagreeing with me, better call him a neo-naazi. Someone's playing Neo-Na-Ązi rock music and quoting famous neo-Na-Ązis left and right, better call him a neo-Na-Ązi.
Not sure how this is so confusing for you? |

Axis Raikkonen
EXPCS Corp SpaceMonkey's Alliance
53
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 18:15:00 -
[10] - Quote
Roderick Grey wrote: If you failed that, Ivana is accusing Varesk of being a Neo-**** because he's buttflustered due to his leader sperging out his bitterness where it wasn't needed.
I'm not sure I see where Ivana accused Varesk of being a neo-Na-Ązi. I see this:
Quote:So objecting ageinst neo ***** and rasists makes us BoB? Do you feel hit by the arguments since you make that connection? ...but I didn't take it as "Varesk is a neo-Na-Ązi". |
|

Axis Raikkonen
EXPCS Corp SpaceMonkey's Alliance
54
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 18:21:00 -
[11] - Quote
Fon Revedhort wrote:Womyn Power wrote: I have no problem with people of any skin color, creed, or nationality who chose to leave behind where they've come from and assimilate to the culture that prevails in the land where I am from.
I have a problem with people who come to a country, completely alien in culture and creed and assume that because some leftists who have taken their ideology too far they are entitled to the social welfare and services of the community itself. This is nothing but intentional destruction of culture by idiots who have chosen to drink the koolaid of cultural marxism.
As for your argument of 'get out of my country that I'm not originally from'; how exactly do you know I'm not from a country that has housed my ancestors for literally thousands of years? In Fons case, he's from Russia, he is of the Rus is he not? I think literally 1000 years of heritage and tradition of his people is worth saving and standing up for. Though I do respect your opinion if you think it should be thrown to the wind - however, I will stand against that until my dying day. White people have created something to be proud of, and proud of it I am.
Sums it up pretty nice, actually. We've got our land, they've got theirs. Why lay claims on something neither you nor your grandfathers earned instead of just agreeing to be a mere guest in someone's home? Sadly, perverts can hardly comprehend such basic things and would rather indeed provoke the universal hatred. Alas. Thanks for finally joining our discussion.
The real question is, if you're sitting on the CSM with a Jew, a homosexual, a gypsy, a black person, an asian, etc., are you able to set your prejudices and your Neo-Na-Ązi beliefs aside and work with them as human beings on the same level with a sense of mutual respect and dignity? |

Axis Raikkonen
EXPCS Corp SpaceMonkey's Alliance
55
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 19:02:00 -
[12] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:Steve Ronuken wrote:Frying Doom wrote:tbh I think if they did it would end up in an EU court.
But whatever I feel I have pushed hard enough to defend someone whos beliefs I cannot stand long enough. That'd be interesting. What with Iceland not being part of the EU yet. The servers are located within England, these forums are located within England, the third part processing is located in England, subsequently it can be argued that they operate within the EU, even though the summits are held outside of the EU. Also I stand corrected on the court see above. That's where it gets tricky, because the servers being in the EU has nothing to do with how CCP, a company based in Iceland, manages its internet spaceships council, which is not a legally recognized entity and really is just an extension of an Icelandic business.
It's kind of fuzzy in some respects, but definitely falls on the side of "EU can't touch this". |

Axis Raikkonen
EXPCS Corp SpaceMonkey's Alliance
57
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 19:17:00 -
[13] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote: I think being that the service of their product and the receiving of monies from those transactions is within the EU that a good case can be made. Otherwise every oil business in the world would be set up in Iceland.
It's more fine-grained than that.
Usually in these multinational scenarios, a business entity creates a subsidiary to operate solely within a certain country. BMW is very much a German car company, but their operations in the US are conducted by BMW of North America, LLC.
Issues pertaining to BMW of North America, LLC are subject to the laws of the United States, not the laws of Germany. Similarly, worker issues are handled under OSHA and the USDOC and not, say, the German Worker's Council.
I'm not sure how exactly CCP has set themselves up from a legal standpoint, but I would imagine it's very similar. Their operations side of the business (let's call it CCP Hosting Ltd.) would most likely be based in the UK and as a result CCP is only bound to EU law in matters that concern their hosting operations, but for administrative issues that fall under CCP Iceland (the CSM being one), Icelandic law prevails.
This assumes that there are even any laws pertaining to the CSM as it's not a recognized legal entity - just a group of random people who chat on Skype and occasionally fly to very cold places to meet up in person. |
|
|
|